hjmejm37 hjmejm37
  • 01-03-2021
  • History
contestada

who believed a bill of rights would be redundant and unnecessary- federalists or antifederalists ​

Respuesta :

emarithomas32 emarithomas32
  • 01-03-2021

Answer:

The Federalist

Explanation:

They argued that the constitution did not need a bill of rights because the people and the states kept any power not given to the federal government.

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Spanish credit recovery help me
What is the slope of the line that passes through (2, 5) and (-1, 5) ? A. -3 B. 0 C. undefined D. 3
Simplify. 600(1+0.03)^12
Which shows the need for gene banks for agricultural crops? Plagues wiped out the entire crop in a large region. Global warming caused reduced rainfall in
A group of students stood in a circle to play a game. The circle had a diameter of 22 meters. Which measurement is closest to the circumference of the circle in
Zack borrowed $1,087 for 12 months at 11 percent interest. If he must pay 11.00 per $100, what is Zack's monthly payment?
how does wilbur escape from his pen?
Reduce -2+b2 by 7+b2
What did the passage of the 15th Amendment during the Reconstruction Era accomplish?
Rosario is concerned about her physical fitness. She has been recording in her journal the number of minutes she exercises each day for several days. She learns